The Federalist Papers Again
Ben Everidge Special for Thomas
Photo Credit: Adobe Stock
A Thomas Reader’s Guide for Modern Americans …
Given events of the past decade or two, it is worth remembering why we have the form of government, imperfect as it may be at times, that we have today. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, made a compelling argument for the American Constitution in their day and it bears reminding today,
Read them for your self. The explanations contained in each of the 85 chapters make perfect sense. Here to help you, however, is a summary of each chapter with an explanation of what each chapter was saying and why it was and is important to you.
The refresher is worth the effort!
Introduction
In 1787-1788, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, writing under the shared name Publius, published a series of 85 essays urging Americans to ratify the newly drafted U.S. Constitution.
These Federalist Papers explained the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, defended the proposed Constitution, and addressed the fears and objections of skeptics.
These Federalist Papers are not just historical artifacts; they are a manual for how our republic works and a warning about what happens when it doesn’t.
This guide translates for you, in our opinion, each paper into plain, modern language, so you can see what they said, why it mattered in 1787-1788, and why it still matters today.
Perhaps, more than ever.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 1-10)
The Choice Before America | Hamilton (No. 1) frames the question: survive as one nation or risk collapse as many.
Foreign Dangers | Jay (Nos. 2-5) warns that division makes America a target; unity is the only defense.
Internal Conflict | Hamilton (Nos. 6-8) shows that states left to themselves will fight, arm, and oppress their people.
Faction Control | Hamilton and Madison (Nos. 9-10) argue that a large republic is the best way to check special interests, prevent mob rule, and protect minority rights.
In plain English:
The Constitution is the only path to keep America safe, prosperous, and free. A strong union deters foreign enemies, prevents states from warring against each other, and ensures that no single faction can dominate the whole nation.
Federalist No. 1 | Introduction (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The decision before Americans is whether to unite under the new Constitution or break into smaller confederacies. Political debate will be clouded by personal ambition, fear, and manipulation.
Why it was important: Hamilton sets the tone for the series - unity is a matter of survival, not just preference.
Federalist No. 2 | Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence (Jay)
What it was saying: Americans share common history, values, and interests; splitting apart would make the states vulnerable to foreign interference.
Why it was important: Jay highlighted that foreign powers were waiting to exploit the division.
Federalist No. 3 | The Same Subject Continued (Jay)
What it was saying: A strong national government will handle foreign affairs more wisely than individual states, reducing the risk of war.
Why it was important: Jay argued here for one unified voice abroad.
Federalist No. 4 | The Same Subject Continued (Jay)
What it was saying: Foreign nations go to war for power and profit, not just defense. America’s growth will make it a target.
Why it was important: Jay makes the argument that unity is a matter of necessity, not convenience.
Federalist No. 5 | The Same Subject Continued (Jay)
What it was saying: Using England’s history as an example, Jay warns that divided confederacies would become jealous rivals, leading to internal wars.
Why it was important: Recast union as a peace treaty among the states before war breaks out.
Federalist No. 6 | Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Separate states will inevitably fight due to human ambition and greed. History proves it.
Why it was important: Killed the fantasy that independence means harmony.
Federalist No. 7 | The Same Subject Continued (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Border disputes, trade conflicts, and debt arguments would pit states against each other without a strong union.
Why it was important: Showed disunion as a likely trigger for civil war.
Federalist No. 8 | The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Division means standing armies, militarized borders, and reduced liberty.
Why it was important: Hamilton warned that freedom erodes when constant defense becomes necessary.
Federalist No. 9 | The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (Hamilton)
What it was saying: A large union prevents dangerous factions from dominating; Montesquieu’s ideas support this.
Why it was important: Hamilton set up Madison’s famous argument in Federalist 10.
Federalist No. 10 | The Same Subject Continued (Madison)
What it was saying: Factions are inevitable; the best way to control their effects is a large republic where many interests cancel each other out.
Why it was important: It became the most famous defense of the Constitution’s design.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 11-20)
This section moves the argument from foreign threats and prosperity to internal weakness and history’s lessons:
Union strengthens trade and naval power (11).
Union provides reliable revenue (12).
One government is cheaper than many (13).
Federalism balances size and local control (14).
The Articles are fatally flawed (15-20).
In plain English:
The Constitution doesn’t just fix today’s problems. It prevents America from becoming another failed confederacy, like those already buried in history.
Federalist No. 11 | “The Utility of the Union in Respect to Commercial Relations and a Navy” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Unity strengthens America’s economic and maritime power. A single commercial policy gives the nation leverage in trade negotiations, while a national navy protects shipping and asserts U.S. presence abroad.
Why it was important: Hamilton reframed the Constitution not just as survival, but prosperity, contending America could compete with Europe only if it acted as one.
Federalist No. 12 | “The Utility of the Union in Respect to Revenue” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: A unified government can raise revenue efficiently, mainly through import duties. One system prevents smuggling and reduces the need for burdensome taxes on citizens.
Why it was important: At a time when the national treasury was empty, Hamilton made clear: without revenue, there can be no defense, no credit, and no stability.
Federalist No. 13 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: A single government is cheaper than multiple confederacies. Defense, administration, and diplomacy are less costly when shared.
Why it was important: Hamilton appealed to taxpayers’ wallets: unity is not just safer, it’s more affordable.
Federalist No. 14 | “Objections to the Proposed Constitution from Extent of Territory Answered” (Madison)
What it was saying: Critics said America was too large to govern. Madison replies: the Constitution creates a federal system, not one monolithic government. States will manage local issues, while the union handles national matters.
Why it was important: Madison sought to reassure skeptics that the Constitution balanced the scales and local control. It wasn’t about replacing state authority but coordinating it.
Federalist No. 15 | “The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Articles of Confederation don’t work. The federal government has no real power to enforce laws, raise revenue, or act decisively.
Why it was important: Hamilton slammed the door on the old system, warning that the Articles guaranteed national collapse.
Federalist No. 16 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Confederation governs only states, not individuals. That means laws can be ignored unless enforced by military force - an absurd situation.
Why it was important: Hamilton pushed the idea that honest government must operate directly on the people.
Federalist No. 17 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics feared the federal government would crush states. Hamilton replies: People are naturally more loyal to their state governments, which handle daily affairs. The federal role is limited to national issues.
Why it was important: He flipped the fear: the federal government won’t swallow the states. If anything, states are more likely to dominate daily life.
Federalist No. 18 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton & Madison)
What it was saying: They point to Greek confederacies, arguing that weak central authority led to rivalries, wars, and collapse.
Why it was important: History proves that loose alliances fail. America would repeat the same mistakes under the Articles of Confederation.
Federalist No. 19 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton & Madison)
What it was saying: Hamilton and Madison cite the Holy Roman Empire as being hundreds of small states under a weak emperor, plagued by foreign meddling and constant conflict.
Why it was important: The U.S. risked becoming another fractured, manipulated “empire in name only.”
Federalist No. 20 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton & Madison)
What it was saying: The United Netherlands is another example, paralyzed by state veto power, unable to act as a real nation.
Why it was important: It was a direct parallel to the Articles of Confederation, where any state could block national action.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 21-30)
This section shifts from criticizing the Articles to outlining what the Constitution provides:
The Articles are structurally broken (21-22).
The federal government must have full power to act in defense and emergencies (23-25).
Congress needs military authority with oversight (26-27).
Tyranny can still be resisted by states and citizens (28).
Militias are helpful but not enough. Revenue and armies are essential (29-30).
In plain English:
The Constitution fixes what the Articles broke, giving America strength, readiness, and solvency without giving up liberty.
Federalist No. 21 | “Other Defects of the Present Confederation” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Articles of Confederation are fatally weak: no power to enforce laws, no national army, an unfair tax system, and no control over commerce.
Why it was important: Hamilton showed that goodwill alone can’t sustain a nation. A government must have teeth.
Federalist No. 22 | “The Same Subject Continued: Other Defects of the Present Confederation” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Articles create paralysis: no power to regulate trade, supermajority requirements for decisions, equal votes for unequal states, and no enforcement on individuals.
Why it was important: Hamilton was dismantling the Articles point by point, proving they guarantee gridlock and weakness.
Federalist No. 23 | “The Necessity of a Government as Energetic as the One Proposed” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The federal government must have unlimited means to carry out core duties: defense, peace, commerce, and foreign relations. Emergencies can’t be anticipated.
Why it was important: Hamilton made the pivot from “the Articles don’t work” to “here’s what government must be able to do.”
Federalist No. 24 | “The Powers Necessary to the Common Defense” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics feared standing armies in peacetime. Hamilton argues America’s borders are too exposed to leave defense to militias alone.
Why it was important: He reframed preparedness as protection, not tyranny.
Federalist No. 25 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Relying on states for defense is dangerous. Some will under-invest, others will compete. Only national defense prevents jealousy and gaps.
Why it was important: Defense is a collective insurance policy; the Constitution makes sure everyone contributes and benefits.
Federalist No. 26 | “Restraining the Legislative Authority regarding the Common Defense Considered” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Congress must have the ability always to fund an army, but with checks. Appropriations every two years prevent abuse.
Why it was important: Hamilton tied military readiness directly to constitutional oversight.
Federalist No. 27 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The new federal government will act directly on the people, not just states, building trust and reducing resistance.
Why it was important: A government seen as fair and close to the people is less feared and more obeyed.
Federalist No. 28 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: If the federal government turns tyrannical, the people and the states can resist. It won’t have unchecked power.
Why it was important: Hamilton acknowledged the right of resistance, showing confidence in constitutional checks.
Federalist No. 29 | “Concerning the Militia” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: A well-regulated militia is valuable, but unrealistic for all citizens. A trained portion is better, supplemented by a regular army.
Why it was important: Balanced the Second Amendment spirit with practical defense needs.
Federalist No. 30 | “Concerning the General Power of Taxation” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Defense, safety, and public welfare all cost money. The federal government requires independent taxing power to operate effectively.
Why it was important: Hamilton was blunt: without revenue, government is powerless.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 31-40)
This set transitions from taxation and federal power to the legitimacy of the Constitution itself:
Federal taxation is necessary, flexible, and fair (31-36).
The Convention struck a careful balance, even amid difficulty (37).
Opponents offer no workable alternative (38).
The Constitution is truly republican and federal (39).
The Convention acted within its responsibility; the people remain the final authority (40).
In plain English:
This isn’t a power grab. It’s a balanced, republican framework designed by compromise and entrusted to the people to accept or reject.
Federalist No. 31 | “Concerning the General Power of Taxation” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Every government must have the means to achieve its end. Defense, welfare, and stability all require money. Limiting federal taxation would be reckless, since emergencies can’t be predicted.
Why it was important: Hamilton framed taxation as fuel for survival. You can’t assign responsibilities and then deny the resources to fulfill them.
Federalist No. 32 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Federal taxation power doesn’t eliminate state taxation. Both can coexist, except in cases made exclusively federal (like import duties).
Why it was important: Reassured states they weren’t losing fiscal independence - just sharing the load.
Federalist No. 33 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Defends the Necessary and Proper Clause and Supremacy Clause: federal laws must prevail where national interests are at stake, or else the union is meaningless.
Why it was important: Hamilton insisted that supremacy is coordination, not tyranny. Without it, national laws would be dead letters.
Federalist No. 34 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The federal government must plan for the extraordinary, like war, not just everyday needs. States can manage local expenses, but only the union can marshal vast resources.
Why it was important: A pragmatic case for flexibility in federal finance.
Federalist No. 35 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics worried merchants would dominate Congress. Hamilton argued that representatives can legislate for the public good without belonging to every class, since interests overlap.
Why it was important: Defended representative democracy itself: elections, not occupational quotas, ensure accountability.
Federalist No. 36 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Federal taxes will often be collected through state systems, using local knowledge to ensure fairness.
Why it was important: Showed the federal design as cooperative, not alien—federalism at work in taxation.
Federalist No. 37 | “Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government” (Madison)
What it was saying: Building a new government is complex. Balancing liberty, stability, and energy requires compromise and experimentation.
Why it was important: Madison reminded readers that the Constitution was crafted with humility. Imperfection was expected, but progress was real.
Federalist No. 38 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Critics of the Constitution disagree on an alternative; they oppose. Meanwhile, the Articles were far more flawed, yet were adopted under less scrutiny.
Why it was important: Madison turned the tables: rejecting the Constitution without a better plan is irresponsible.
Federalist No. 39 | “Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles” (Madison)
What it was saying: The Constitution is republican. Power derives from the people, officials are elected, and authority is divided between the federal and state governments.
Why it was important: Madison reassured Americans that the Constitution was faithful to the Revolution’s democratic ideals.
Federalist No. 40 | “The Powers of the Convention to Form a Mixed Government Examined” (Madison)
What it was saying: Critics claimed the Convention exceeded its mandate. Madison replies: their duty was to preserve the union, and since the Articles were irreparably broken, creating a new Constitution was justified. Ratification by the people is the final safeguard.
Why it was important: Framed the Constitution not as an imposition, but as a proposal the people themselves would choose.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 41-50)
This section explains what powers the Constitution grants and how they’re balanced:
Powers are necessary, not excessive (41-43).
States are restricted from actions that destabilize the union (44).
Federal powers are limited; states remain dominant in daily life (45-46).
Checks and balances ensure liberty without chaos (47-50).
In plain English:
The Constitution is strong enough to govern and flexible enough to protect liberty, while giving the people the final say through elections.
Federalist No. 41 | “General View of the Powers Conferred by the Constitution” (Madison)
What it was saying: Every power granted in the Constitution falls into categories like defense, commerce, and general welfare. The question isn’t whether powers are dangerous, but whether they’re necessary. Madison insists they are.
Why it was important: He reframed the debate: these powers aren’t luxuries, they’re survival tools.
Federalist No. 42 | “The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered” (Madison)
What it was saying: The Constitution fixes confusion over foreign policy, trade, naturalization, and interstate disputes. Inconsistent state laws have caused chaos under the Articles of Confederation.
Why it was important: Madison showed that unity isn’t abstract. It solves practical problems Americans already faced.
Federalist No. 43 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Madison highlights additional powers: protecting intellectual property, admitting new states, managing territories, and guaranteeing republican government in every state.
Why it was important: It revealed the Constitution’s forward-looking design, where innovation, expansion, and stability were built in.
Federalist No. 44 | “Restrictions on the Authority of the States” (Madison)
What it was saying: States are barred from printing money, making treaties, taxing imports, or passing laws that impair contracts. These restrictions prevent disorder.
Why it was important: The Constitution doesn’t just empower the federal government. It also blocks states from undermining the system.
Federalist No. 45 | “Powers of the Union to the State Governments Considered” (Madison)
What it was saying: Federal powers are few and defined; state powers are broad and touch daily life. Federal authority mainly covers defense, commerce, and foreign affairs.
Why it was important: Madison reassured citizens that states would remain central to everyday governance.
Federalist No. 46 | “The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared” (Madison)
What it was saying: People’s loyalty will always lean toward their state governments. If the federal government overreaches, states and citizens can push back through elections or, if necessary, militias.
Why it was important: Madison reinforced that power ultimately rests with the people and their states.
Federalist No. 47 | “The Structure of the New Government” (Madison)
What it was saying: Total separation of powers is a myth; Montesquieu himself argued for checks and balances, not isolation. The Constitution divides powers while ensuring overlaps to prevent tyranny.
Why it was important: Clarified that separation of powers means balance, not rigid silos.
Federalist No. 48 | “Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated” (Madison)
What it was saying: Paper barriers won’t stop one branch from overreaching. Each branch must have the tools to defend itself.
Why it was important: Checks and balances must be real, not symbolic.
Federalist No. 49 | “Method of Guarding Against Encroachments” (Madison)
What it was saying: Constant constitutional conventions would destabilize the system and invite manipulation by public passions. Regular elections are the proper check.
Why it was important: Madison argued that stability requires fixed rules. Not constant rewrites.
Federalist No. 50 | “Periodical Appeals to the People Considered” (Madison)
What it was saying: Even regular, scheduled constitutional reviews would be swayed by politics. Elections already give people the power to course correct.
Why it was important: Cemented the idea that the Constitution is built to endure, with stability anchored in the ballot box.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 51-60)
This section links the theory of government to practical representation.
Checks and balances harness human nature for liberty’s sake (51).
The House is the people’s chamber, accountable through frequent elections (52-55).
The House will grow fairly and balance local/national concerns (56-58).
Federal oversight of elections ensures stability and fairness (59-60).
In plain English:
The Constitution protects liberty by balancing ambition with accountability, giving the people strong, fair, and growing representation in government.
Federalist No. 51 | “The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances” (Madison)
What it was saying: Government must be designed to control itself as well as the governed. Each branch should check the others. “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” A large republic also makes it harder for factions to oppress minorities.
Why it was important: This is the core defense of the checks-and-balances system that defines American government today.
Federalist No. 52 | “The House of Representatives” (Madison)
What it was saying: The House will be directly elected every two years. Frequent elections ensure accountability but also give enough time for members to learn the job. Voting qualifications follow state rules.
Why it was important: The House is meant to be the people’s chamber, closely tied to public opinion.
Federalist No. 53 | “The House Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Two-year terms strike the right balance. Shorter terms would make representatives inexperienced and vulnerable to manipulation, especially in foreign affairs.
Why it was important: Madison defended competence in government as essential to effective representation.
Federalist No. 54 | “Apportionment of Members” (Madison)
What it was saying: Representation is based on population, with the Three-Fifths Compromise counting enslaved persons partially for both taxation and representation.
Why it was important: An uncomfortable but necessary reminder that slavery was embedded in the political framework to keep the union intact.
Federalist No. 55 | “The Total Number of the House of Representatives” (Madison)
What it was saying: Critics said 65 members were too few. Madison counters that the number will grow with the population and that too many representatives could cause chaos.
Why it was important: Showed the Constitution’s built-in flexibility for expansion.
Federalist No. 56 | “The House Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Representatives don’t need encyclopedic local knowledge. States handle local issues. The House focuses on national concerns, which necessitate a broader perspective.
Why it was important: Defended the House’s small initial size as practical, not dangerous.
Federalist No. 57 | “The House Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Fears of elite domination are misplaced. Representatives are directly elected, laws bind lawmakers as well as citizens, and frequent elections keep them accountable.
Why it was important: Reinforced that the ballot box is the ultimate safeguard.
Federalist No. 58 | “The House Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Critics worried Congress wouldn’t expand the House as the population grew. Madison points to the census requirement and pressure from larger states as guarantees of fairness.
Why it was important: Reassured citizens that representation would grow with the nation.
Federalist No. 59 | “Concerning the Regulation of Elections” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The federal government must have the power to regulate congressional elections. Otherwise, states could cripple the union by refusing to hold them.
Why it was important: Secured national continuity, elections couldn’t be sabotaged by state inaction.
Federalist No. 60 | “The Same Subject Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics feared Congress would manipulate election laws to favor particular groups. Hamilton argued that shared power between states and Congress makes this nearly impossible.
Why it was important: Reassured citizens that elections would remain fair and representative.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 61-70)
This stretch covers the Senate’s stabilizing role and the design of the presidency:
Federal oversight keeps elections stable (61).
The Senate exists for stability, long-term vision, and foreign policy (62-66).
The presidency is strong but limited. It was built for energy, decisiveness, and accountability (67-70).
In plain English:
The Constitution steadies America with a balanced Senate and energizes it with a single executive - two pillars designed to keep the republic safe from both chaos and monarchy.
Federalist No. 61 | “Concerning the Regulation of Elections” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Congress needs power to regulate elections so states can’t sabotage the union by refusing to hold them or by scheduling them so irregularly that national business is disrupted. States still control most details unless national uniformity is needed.
Why it was important: Hamilton stressed that federal oversight of elections isn’t a power grab. It’s common sense for stability.
Federalist No. 62 | “The Senate” (Madison)
What it was saying: The Senate’s six-year terms provide stability and continuity. Chosen by state legislatures (under the original Constitution), senators anchor the link between states and the national government. A smaller chamber balances the more changeable House.
Why it was important: Madison framed the Senate as a steadying force: Slower, wiser, and more consistent.
Federalist No. 63 | “The Senate Continued” (Madison)
What it was saying: Senators’ longer terms make them less vulnerable to passing passions. They can take a longer view of policy, especially foreign affairs. Historical republics relied on similar stabilizing second chambers.
Why it was important: Madison defended the Senate as the body meant to resist rash, short-term impulses.
Federalist No. 64 | “The Powers of the Senate” (Jay)
What it was saying: The Senate shares treaty-making power with the president. Senators, with their longer terms, provide the stability and expertise needed for foreign relations.
Why it was important: Ensured that diplomacy would blend executive decisiveness with legislative oversight.
Federalist No. 65 | “The Powers of the Senate Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Senate is the proper body to try impeachments. Impeachment is political, not purely legal, since it concerns violations of public trust. The Supreme Court is too small and too judicial to handle such cases.
Why it was important: Hamilton argued this cemented the Senate’s role in impeachment as a blend of fairness, size, and political accountability.
Federalist No. 66 | “Objections to the Senate as a Court for Impeachments Considered” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics feared bias since the Senate also confirms appointments. Hamilton counters: the Senate can still judge impartially, and impeachment is rare by design.
Why it was important: Reinforced trust in the Senate as the right body for extraordinary trials.
Federalist No. 67 | “The Executive Department” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Hamilton begins defending the presidency. Critics exaggerate by calling it a monarchy. The Constitution gives the president real but limited powers, defined and checked by Congress and the courts.
Why it was important: First step in reframing the presidency as strong enough to lead, but not a throne.
Federalist No. 68 | “The Mode of Electing the President” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The Electoral College allows thoughtful electors to choose presidents, reducing risks of mob rule or foreign manipulation. Electors meet in states, not as one group, to limit corruption.
Why it was important: Hamilton saw this as a safeguard for fair and secure presidential selection.
Federalist No. 69 | “The Real Character of the Executive” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Hamilton contrasts the president with a king:
The president serves for a term, not life.
Can be impeached and removed.
Shares powers with Congress.
Can not make laws or control the purse.
Why it was important: Rebutted fears of monarchy by highlighting the president’s limits.
Federalist No. 70 | “The Executive Department Further Considered” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Hamilton argues for a single, energetic executive:
One person ensures accountability and speed.
Multiple executives invite division, delay, and blame-shifting.
Why it was important: Laid the philosophical foundation for the modern presidency. Energetic but still accountable.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 71-80)
This set lays out a balanced executive and judiciary:
The president needs stability, independence, and energy to lead effectively (71-77).
The judiciary is weak by design, but independent to protect liberty (78–79).
Federal courts unify the law for the whole nation (80).
In plain English:
The Constitution empowers the president to lead effectively and the courts to protect liberty, with both institutions tightly bound by checks and balances.
Federalist No. 71 | “The Duration in Office of the Executive” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The president’s four-year term is long enough to give stability and courage in decision-making, but short enough to keep accountability. A too-short term would make the president timid and overly dependent on fleeting public opinion.
Why it was important: Hamilton balanced stability with democracy, arguing the president must be able to lead boldly while still answerable to voters.
Federalist No. 72 | “The Duration in Office of the Executive Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Hamilton opposed constitutional term limits. Good leaders should be re-electable if the people want them. Term limits waste experience, encourage short-term thinking, and could destabilize the nation during periods of transition.
Why it was important: While the 22nd Amendment later added limits, Hamilton’s defense of continuity explains why leadership stability mattered in the early republic.
Federalist No. 73 | “The Provision for the Support of the Executive, and the Veto Power” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The president’s salary cannot be changed during his term, protecting independence. The veto allows the president to block rash or harmful legislation, but Congress can override with a two-thirds vote.
Why it was important: The veto is not absolute but a vital check to balance legislative power.
Federalist No. 74 | “The Command of the Military and Naval Forces, and the Pardoning Power” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: One commander-in-chief ensures speed and unity in defense. The pardoning power allows mercy, especially in times of rebellion, when clemency can restore peace.
Why it was important: Framed military command and pardons as tools of stability, not domination.
Federalist No. 75 | “The Treaty-Making Power of the Executive” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Treaties require the president and two-thirds of the Senate. This ensures foreign policy has decisiveness and consensus.
Why it was important: Created one of the clearest examples of shared power in the Constitution.
Federalist No. 76 | “The Appointing Power of the Executive” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The president nominates officers, but the Senate must confirm. One person nominates for accountability; the Senate prevents corruption or favoritism.
Why it was important: This remains the foundation of America’s appointment process.
Federalist No. 77 | “The Appointing Power Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Senate confirmation prevents abuse and ensures stability, since a new president can’t just fire everyone and start over without checks.
Why it was important: Reinforced that appointment power is shared, not absolute.
Federalist No. 78 | “The Judiciary Department” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: The judiciary is the weakest branch, having no control of the sword or purse, only judgment. Independence is essential to guard liberty. Life tenure ensures impartiality. Courts can strike down unconstitutional laws (judicial review).
Why it was important: The cornerstone of America’s judicial philosophy is that the courts are guardians of the Constitution.
Federalist No. 79 | “The Judiciary Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Judicial independence requires secure pay, free from political manipulation. Judges can be impeached for misconduct, ensuring accountability.
Why it was important: Balanced independence with responsibility.
Federalist No. 80 | “The Powers of the Judiciary” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Federal courts must handle cases involving the Constitution, federal laws, treaties, ambassadors, maritime issues, disputes between states, and cases involving the U.S. itself.
Why it was important: Outlined the judiciary’s scope, ensuring national consistency in law.
The Big Picture Takeaway (Federalist 81-85)
The final essays focus on judicial limits, practical objections, and the urgency of action:
The judiciary is independent but checked (81-83).
Demands for a Bill of Rights reflect caution, but Hamilton argued rights were already protected (84).
The Constitution isn’t perfect, but it’s the best chance for union and liberty, and it can be amended (85).
In plain English:
The Federalist Papers close with a call to stop chasing perfection and start preserving the union. The Constitution is strong, flexible, and ready. The real danger is delays.
Federalist No. 81 | “The Judiciary Continued, and the Distribution of Judicial Authority” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Hamilton addresses fears of judicial supremacy. The judiciary is the weakest branch. It cannot enforce its own rulings or control money. Appeals from state courts are necessary to keep laws uniform. Congress can regulate lower courts, and judges can be impeached if they abuse power.
Why it was important: Assured Americans that federal judges were powerful enough to guard the Constitution but still limited and accountable.
Federalist No. 82 | “The Judiciary Continued” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Federal and state courts will work together. State courts keep much of their original authority, and federal courts only intervene in national or interstate issues.
Why it was important: Calmed fears that federal courts would swallow state courts, emphasizing complementarity instead of competition.
Federalist No. 83 | “The Judiciary Continued in Relation to Trial by Jury” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Critics objected that the Constitution didn’t guarantee jury trials in all civil cases. Hamilton replies: jury trials are secured for criminal cases, and civil cases vary too much for a single rule. Congress can legislate to expand jury use if needed.
Why it was important: Showed that the omission was practical, not an attack on liberties—flexibility was intentional.
Federalist No. 84 | “Certain General and Miscellaneous Objections Considered” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Opponents demanded a Bill of Rights. Hamilton argued the Constitution already limited government powers and that listing rights could be dangerous, implying unlisted rights were unprotected. He also dismissed fears about standing armies and the national capital becoming tyrannical.
Why it was important: Ironically, though Hamilton opposed a Bill of Rights here, one was soon adopted. His arguments show the tension between Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Federalist No. 85 | “Concluding Remarks” (Hamilton)
What it was saying: Perfection is impossible. The Constitution is a significant improvement over the Articles of Confederation, and it includes an amendment process to fix flaws. The union must act quickly before disunity destroys the Revolution’s gains.
Why it was important: Hamilton ended with urgency: the time to ratify is now, before America collapses into rival states.
Why Americans Should Care About the Federalist Papers
Most Americans have heard of The Federalist Papers, but far fewer have read them, and fewer still understand their lasting importance. That’s a problem. Because if we want to defend our democracy and protect the Constitution, we need to know the ideas that gave it life.
The Federalist Papers aren’t just historical essays; they are a user’s manual for American self-government. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote them to persuade a divided nation to ratify the Constitution. They explained why union mattered, why liberty demanded structure, and why human nature itself had to be checked by institutions.
Today, when politics is full of soundbites, anger, and mistrust, these papers offer something different: perspective. They remind us that the debates we think of as new - about state power vs. federal power, liberty vs. security, majority rule vs. minority rights - are as old as the Republic itself. And they show us how the Framers built a system strong enough to withstand faction, division, and demagoguery.
Why should Americans care now? Because understanding The Federalist Papers enables us to be better guardians of our freedoms. They teach us that the Constitution was designed to balance energy with restraint, ambition with accountability, rights with responsibilities. And they make clear that liberty doesn’t protect itself. It requires citizens who understand the framework and insist it be honored.
When Hamilton wrote that “a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people,” he was warning us not just about his time, but ours. When Madison argued that “if men were angels, no government would be necessary,” he was reminding us that structure, not trust alone, is what preserves freedom.
The Federalist Papers matter because they are not relics. They are living arguments, still relevant, still sharp, and still guiding us. If we want to keep the Constitution strong and the Bill of Rights secure, we need to read them, wrestle with them, and teach them. Because America doesn’t just need voters, it needs citizens who understand why their republic was built the way it was and why it is worth defending.
Read the U.S. Constitution Here
